Garcia I. Iniguez VON PAMPLONA

García Íñiguez, sometimes García I, II, or III (Arabic: قرسية بن ونّقه البشكنشي†Ž, Garsiya ibn Wannaqo al BaÅ¡kuniÅ¡i) was king of Pamplona from 851/2 to his death in 882. He was educated in Córdoba, as a guest at the court of the Emir of Córdoba. He was the son of Íñigo Arista, the first king of their dynasty. When his father was stricken by paralysis in 842, he became regent of the kingdom (or perhaps co-regent with his uncle Fortún Íñiguez). He and his kinsman MÅ«sā ibn MÅ«sā ibn Fortún of the Banu Qasi rebelled againstthe Cordoban emir in 843. This rebellion was put down by Emir Abd-ar-Rahman II, who attacked the Kingdom of Pamplona, defeating García badly and killing Fortún. At his father's death in851/2, he succeeded to the crown.

Following the death of Íñigo Arista, the Banu Qasi leader MÅ«sā ibn MÅ«sā pursued a policy of Closer allegiance with Muhammad I of Córdoba, leaving García to look to Christian Asturias for an ally. In 859, MÅ«sā ibn MÅ«sā allowed a contingent of Vikings to pass through his lands and attack Navarre, resulting in the capture García, who was forced to pay at least 70,000 gold dinars in ransom. Later the same year, MÅ«sā ibn MÅ«sā attacked the Pamplonese city of Albelda. García and his new friend Ordoño I of Asturias together dealt MÅ«sā a crushing blow, killing, it is said, 10,000 of His magnates in the Battle of Albelda. This, in turn, provoked a Muslim response and the next year, 860, saw García's son and heir Fortún captured and imprisoned by the Moors. He languished in Córdoba for the next 20 years. In 870, García formed an alliance with the Muslim rebel AmrÅ«s ibn Amr ibn AmrÅ«s, who had killed Garcia's nephew MÅ«sā ibn Galindo of Huesca, and the next year was apparently in a new alliance with the sons of MÅ«sā ibn MÅ«sā, now in rebellion against Córdoba.

García I favoured the pilgrims who travelled to Santiago de Compostela, and attempted to guarantee peace for that traffic.

García's death has been subject to scholarly dispute, a result of a paucity of records from the last years of His reign. The lack of subsequent mention of Him after 870 led to the suggestion that he died in that year, and as his heir was in the hands of His enemies, it was argued that García Jiménez then governed the kingdom as regent. García's son, Fortún Garcés, isthen made To succeed upon his released in 880. There is, however, no evidence for such a regency, and Sanchéz Albornoz has cited evidence that García was still living at the time of Hisson's return. Thus it is likely that Balparda was reporting accurate tradition when he suggested García and ally Umar ibn Hafsun, fought a battle at Aybar against the troops of Emir of Córdoba in882, García dying there (although the age provided him, 84 years, is clearly exaggerated).

The identity of García's wife or wives is poorly documented, and has been subject to much speculation. An undated confirmation of an earlier lost charter refers to King García and QueenUrraca Mayor, and this is thought by some to refer to García Íñiguez and an otherwise unknown wife. Based on her name alone, it has been suggested that she was of the Banu Qasi, but other historians have given her different parentage, or even a different king as husband. Likewise, royal princess Leodegundia Ordoñez of Asturias, daughter of Ordoño I of Asturias, is known to have married a ruler of Pamplona, and García Íñiguez is one of those speculated to have been this prince.

García Íñiguez had following children:

Fortún Garcés, the future king.

Sancho Garcés, whose only known child, Aznar Sánchez, married a daughter of King Fortún Garcés and by her had queens Toda Aznárez, wife of King Sancho Garcés I, and Sancha Aznárez,wife ofking Jimeno Garcés.

Onneca Garcés, wife of Aznar Galíndez II.

Velasquita Garcés, married to MutarrÄ«f ibn MÅ«sā ibn Qasi, Wali of Huesca, son of MÅ«sā ibn MÅ«sā.

(perhaps) Jimena, wife of Alfonso III of León (assignment of Her parentage based on political, chronological and onomastic arguments).

Comments